Refractory Brick Vs. Fire Brick: What is the Difference?

Heat containment is a near-constant concern in various industrial processes. It underlies both safety and performance, ensuring that high-temperature systems can operate at optimal efficiency throughout production cycles. This applies to copper-making, iron forging, steelmaking, waste-to-energy practices, and a whole host of other industries that utilize furnaces and kilns – or even simpler components, such as exhaust stacks. Various forms of insulation are available for extremely high-temperature operations, but refractory brick and fire brick are among the most common. Both are used to line the walls of thermal systems to reduce the propagation of heat. So, what’s the difference?

Refractory Brick vs Fire Brick: Key Differences

While both refractory bricks and fire bricks are designed for high-temperature applications, there are some critical differences that make them suitable for different purposes:

1. Composition: Refractory bricks, including SiC refractory bricks, are typically made from materials like silicon carbide, alumina, zirconia or are containing a higher amount of mullite. Fire bricks, on the other hand, are primarily composed of clay minerals and alumina or mullite in lower quantities

2. Thermal properties: Refractory bricks generally have a  higher thermal conductivity as of their higher density

3. Application-specific performance: Refractory bricks are designed for specific high-temperature applications and environments, offering better performance in terms of wear, corrosion because of direct contact with the corrosive media, and thermal resistance. Fire bricks, while suitable for general high-temperature applications, may not perform as well in more demanding environments and have a limited maximum temperature of use.

4. Cost: Due to their high quality raw materials and properties, cost of refractory bricks is typically premium compared to fire bricks.

For more information, do not hesitate to contact Haoze company.